French Tarot - SHOGIX.NET
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Suit breaking probabilities

3 players tarot

It isn’t necessary to know the exact percentages to manage this aspect of the game. What really matters is understanding a few basic rules so you know which way the balance leans, as Jean-Marc Roudinesco would say.

Notice in the table below that symmetrical distributions with an even number of missing cards are always less likely than slightly asymmetrical distributions (except for the 1-1 split when only 2 cards are missing).

Also note that a specific symmetrical layout is more likely than a specific asymmetrical one. It is the total number of asymmetrical layouts that makes those distributions more frequent overall. To sum up, assuming R-V-9-7 are missing in a suit :

  • If someone asks you to bet on the distribution, bet on a 3-1 split.
  • But if someone asks you to choose between these two specific layouts: R-V / 9-7 or R-V-9 / 7, bet on R-V / 9-7.

With an odd number of missing cards, however, the most symmetrical distribution is always the most likely.

How to read this table ?

This table shows the probabilities of suit splits between two opponents in bridge. With minor adjustments, these figures also apply to 3-player Tarot. The general tendencies remain valid in 4-player Tarot as well.

  • The Missing cards column indicates the number of cards missing in the suit.
  • The Split column shows the possible ways those cards may be divided between the two opponents.
  • The Probability column gives the chance of each split occurring.
  • The Number of combinations column shows how many specific card layouts produce that split. Example : 8 (4×2) means there are 4 possible layouts for each opponent, for a total of 8.
  • The Frequency column expresses, as a percentage, the probability of each specific layout.
Distribution probabilities of opponents’ cards in a suit
Missing
cards
Splits Prob.
in %
Combinations
Number Freq.
1 0-1 100% 2 (1x2) 50%
2 0-2 48% 2 (1x2) 24%
1-1 52% 2 26%
3 0-3 22% 2 (1x2) 11%
1-2 78% 6 (3x2) 13%
4 0-4 10% 2 (1x2) 4,7%
1-3 50% 8 (4x2) 6,2%
2-2 40% 6 6,7%
5 0-5 4% 2 (1x2) 1,9%
1-4 28% 10 (5x2) 2,8%
2-3 68% 20 (10x2) 3,4%
6 0-6 1,5% 2 (1x2) 0,7%
1-5 14,5% 12 (6x2) 1,2%
2-4 48,5% 30 (15x2) 1,6%
3-3 35,5% 20 1,7%
7 0-7 0,5% 2 (1x2) 0,3%
1-6 6,8% 14 (7x2) 0,5%
2-5 30,5% 42 (21x2) 0,7%
3-4 62% 70 (35x2) 0,9%
8 0-8 0,2% 2 (1x2) 0,1%
1-7 2,9% 16 (8x2) 0,2%
2-6 17,1% 56 (28x2) 0,3%
3-5 47,1% 112 (56x2) 0,4%
4-4 32,8% 70 0,5%
9 0-9 0,05% 2 (1x2) 0,02%
1-8 1,1% 18 (9x2) 0,06%
2-7 8,5% 72 (36x2) 0,12%
3-6 31,5% 168 (84x2) 0,19%
4-5 58,9% 252 (126x2) 0,23%
10 0-10 0,01% 2 (1x2) 0,005%
1-9 0,35% 20 (10x2) 0,017%
2-8 3,8% 90 (45x2) 0,04%
3-7 18,5% 240 (120x2) 0,08%
4-6 46,1% 420 (210x2) 0,11%
5-5 31,1% 252 0,12%

Modified: 07/02/2026
All rights reserved. © 2002-2026 F. Constantineau

Top
Search

Menu

  • Home
  • Glossary
    • A_L
    • M_Z
  • Deals Analysis
    • Squeeze
    • 2 for 1
    • Slam
    • Endplay
    • Defense
  • Problems
    • Opening lead
    • 5 players
  • Probabilities
  • Official rules
  • Links
  • Contact the author