Suit breaking probabilities
3 players tarot
It isn’t necessary to know the exact percentages to manage this aspect of the game. What really matters is understanding a few basic rules so you know which way the balance leans, as Jean-Marc Roudinesco would say.
Notice in the table below that symmetrical distributions with an even number of missing cards are always less likely than slightly asymmetrical distributions (except for the 1-1 split when only 2 cards are missing).
Also note that a specific symmetrical layout is more likely than a specific asymmetrical one. It is the total number of asymmetrical layouts that makes those distributions more frequent overall. To sum up, assuming R-V-9-7 are missing in a suit :
- If someone asks you to bet on the distribution, bet on a 3-1 split.
- But if someone asks you to choose between these two specific layouts: R-V / 9-7 or R-V-9 / 7, bet on R-V / 9-7.
With an odd number of missing cards, however, the most symmetrical distribution is always the most likely.
How to read this table ?
This table shows the probabilities of suit splits between two opponents in bridge. With minor adjustments, these figures also apply to 3-player Tarot. The general tendencies remain valid in 4-player Tarot as well.
- The Missing cards column indicates the number of cards missing in the suit.
- The Split column shows the possible ways those cards may be divided between the two opponents.
- The Probability column gives the chance of each split occurring.
- The Number of combinations column shows how many specific card layouts produce that split. Example : 8 (4×2) means there are 4 possible layouts for each opponent, for a total of 8.
- The Frequency column expresses, as a percentage, the probability of each specific layout.
| Missing cards |
Splits | Prob. in % |
Combinations | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | Freq. | |||
| 1 | 0-1 | 100% | 2 (1x2) | 50% |
| 2 | 0-2 | 48% | 2 (1x2) | 24% |
| 1-1 | 52% | 2 | 26% | |
| 3 | 0-3 | 22% | 2 (1x2) | 11% |
| 1-2 | 78% | 6 (3x2) | 13% | |
| 4 | 0-4 | 10% | 2 (1x2) | 4,7% |
| 1-3 | 50% | 8 (4x2) | 6,2% | |
| 2-2 | 40% | 6 | 6,7% | |
| 5 | 0-5 | 4% | 2 (1x2) | 1,9% |
| 1-4 | 28% | 10 (5x2) | 2,8% | |
| 2-3 | 68% | 20 (10x2) | 3,4% | |
| 6 | 0-6 | 1,5% | 2 (1x2) | 0,7% |
| 1-5 | 14,5% | 12 (6x2) | 1,2% | |
| 2-4 | 48,5% | 30 (15x2) | 1,6% | |
| 3-3 | 35,5% | 20 | 1,7% | |
| 7 | 0-7 | 0,5% | 2 (1x2) | 0,3% |
| 1-6 | 6,8% | 14 (7x2) | 0,5% | |
| 2-5 | 30,5% | 42 (21x2) | 0,7% | |
| 3-4 | 62% | 70 (35x2) | 0,9% | |
| 8 | 0-8 | 0,2% | 2 (1x2) | 0,1% |
| 1-7 | 2,9% | 16 (8x2) | 0,2% | |
| 2-6 | 17,1% | 56 (28x2) | 0,3% | |
| 3-5 | 47,1% | 112 (56x2) | 0,4% | |
| 4-4 | 32,8% | 70 | 0,5% | |
| 9 | 0-9 | 0,05% | 2 (1x2) | 0,02% |
| 1-8 | 1,1% | 18 (9x2) | 0,06% | |
| 2-7 | 8,5% | 72 (36x2) | 0,12% | |
| 3-6 | 31,5% | 168 (84x2) | 0,19% | |
| 4-5 | 58,9% | 252 (126x2) | 0,23% | |
| 10 | 0-10 | 0,01% | 2 (1x2) | 0,005% |
| 1-9 | 0,35% | 20 (10x2) | 0,017% | |
| 2-8 | 3,8% | 90 (45x2) | 0,04% | |
| 3-7 | 18,5% | 240 (120x2) | 0,08% | |
| 4-6 | 46,1% | 420 (210x2) | 0,11% | |
| 5-5 | 31,1% | 252 | 0,12% | |
Modified: 07/02/2026
All rights reserved. © 2002-2026 F. Constantineau
